Legal Opinion
Louisiana Oil Refining Company v. Rainwater
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 23, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
This is an action by a creditor of a domestic corporation to recover judgment under our statute against its president and secretary for a debt which was contracted during the period when such president and secretary failed to file the annual statement showing the condition of the corporation.
According to the allegations of the complaint, between October 8 and December 11, 1929, it sold and delivered to the Rainwater-McCarthy Motor Company merchandise in the sum of $464.21, and that there is now due and unpaid the sum of $460.27, that the Rainwater-McCarthy Motor Company was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- McDonald v. MuellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Bank of Blytheville v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Hughes v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bolden v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Sargent v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- McDonald v. WassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Brown v. Arkansas Centennial CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Fischer Lime & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.