Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Willis

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1894No. 15279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to plaintiff. Five actions brought to foreclose mechanics’ liens were consolidated and tried under the above title. Upon the trial the truth of all the allegations of the complaint were admitted except as to attorneys’ fees. The contract under which the work was contracted to be done was read in evidence, and from it, and the admissions, the court found in substance: That the contract which is annexed to the findings was duly filed in the recorder’s office of the city and county of San Francisco, but that “no plans, drawings, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Petaluma Paving Co. v. SingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Helfrich v. RomerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API