Williams v. Harrison
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court entered April 27, 1939, awarding plaintiff a refund of $68,913.34 with interest, assessed and collected by reason of Section 603, Title IV of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev. Acts, entitled “Tax on Toilet Preparations, etc.” The section reads: “There is hereby imposed upon the following articles, sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer, a tax equivalent to 10 per centum of the price for which so sold: Perfumes, essences, extracts, toilet waters, cosmetics [and numerous other designated toilet…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bourjois, Inc. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Luzier's, Inc. v. NeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Inecto, Inc. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campana Corporation v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Benmatt Organization, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Charles Marchand Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Charles Marchand Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.