Legal Opinion

Webber v. Knox

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 19, 1938No. 11052PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

The complaint of Mr. Charles C. Webber, a taxpayer, against the Collector of Internal Revenue for Minnesota, was demurred to on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the demurrer having been sustained, the complaint was dismissed. Mr. Webber appeals.

The facts alleged in the complaint and the grounds of decision against Mr. Web-ber are set forth in the opinion filed by the trial court as follows:

“Plaintiff, a taxpayer, brings this action to recover from the Collector a refund of the 1933 federal income taxes in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Delaney v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  3. Interstate Transit Lines v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Smith v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API