Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Rooker

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1966No. Gen. 49,868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on a verdict in favor of defendants in a personal injury case. Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the plaintiffs on the issue of liability, and that the court also erred in failing to grant a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

Plaintiff Pearl Tatum was riding as a passenger in her husband’s car on January 25, 1958. Her husband, Roy Tatum, was driving the car. The car was proceeding in a westerly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PoynterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  2. Niman v. Pecatonica Livestock Exchange, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Ferdinand v. LindgrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Houchins v. CocciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Weiner v. BattistaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burgdorff v. International Business MacHines Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Central Production Credit Ass'n v. KruseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Glaze v. OwensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Amadeo v. GaynorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. David v. BlackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API