Phillips v. Haring
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
On the question of plaintiff’s • negligence, these facts from his own testimony are significant: When he came over the hill at a distance of eighteen hundred feet from the intersection, he saw defendant’s truck half way down, or about nine hundred feet ahead of him. Plaintiff’s speed was then forty-five to fifty miles per hour. When the truck was four hundred to five hundred feet from the intersection, the vehicles were about two hundred feet apart. He knew that he was steadily gaining on the truck, as was obvious, since he covered about eleven hundred to twelve hundred feet while the truck…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Wuesthoff v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Schultz v. BroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Hephner v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Cole v. PhephlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Hibner v. LindauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Zenner v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953