Legal Opinion
Holden v. Hagopian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1992No. 90-15183PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 27, 1988 plaintiffs/appellants filed a complaint against defendants/appellees alleging violations of sections 12(1) and 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the 1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. section 77Z(1),(2), and section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the 1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), as well as various violations of California state law.1 On May 8, 1989 the district court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend and, in particular, dismissed the causes of action alleging federal securities law violations for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Champion v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Dare v. NamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Dare v. NamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Durkee v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Edwards v. BlanchardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.