Legal Opinion
Dare v. Nam
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 27, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01765-JAH-MSBUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 14 INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN [Doc. No. 3] FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; 15 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, 16 D/B/A MR. COOPER, 17 Defendants. 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, 21 LLP and Inku Nam’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s 22 (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.