Legal Opinion
Dare v. Nam
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 27, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01765-JAH-MSBUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 13 v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 6] 14 INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; 15 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, 16 D/B/A MR. COOPER, 17 Defendants. 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Pending before the Court is Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, d.b.a. Mr. 21 Cooper’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s (“Plaintiff”) 22 complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.