Legal Opinion

Ripka v. Gwinn

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The ground of demurrer to the effect that the requirements of the statute of frauds interpose a bar to the relief prayed for has been abandoned.

This leaves two other causes of demurrer assigned on the record, viz: That the amended bill is without equity, and that it is multifarious in that paragraph 22 presents a cause of action entirely distinct from that set up as the main cause. Paragraph 22 complains that Gwinn in making the conveyance to Ripka purposely omitted from the description some ten or more lots properly belonging to the “Thirtieth Street Development” and included…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
  2. Gassett v. GlazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Barnes v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Pendergast v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  5. Salsbury v. WareIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  2. Kelly v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. Allen v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  4. Gray Co. v. Alemite CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API