Olson v. Industrial Commission

The plaintiffs challenge the finding that Dahl was performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment at the time of his injury. It is their contention that Dahl deviated from his employment when he sought recreation at the liquor store; that there is a presumption of continuity of his personal business and that he was still out side the scope of his employment when the accident occurred; that a person under legal arrest is incapable of entering any sphere of private employment until released by due process of law; that his sole intention upon entering the truck was to escape…