Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Seaboard Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama
Decided July 2, 1897No. 203PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
The question to he considered in this case is whether the defendant, in transporting property from Fair-ford, in the stale of Alabama, to Chicago, in the state of Illinois, and in transporting goods from Cincinnati, in the state of Ohio, to Fair-ford, is engaged in such transporta lion, under a “common arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment,” within the meaning of that language, as used in the act to. regulate commerce. The defendant claims that it is not engaged in inters tale traffic; that the freight charge from Fail-ford to Chicago and from Cincinnati to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cin., NO & Tex. Pac. Railway v. Int. Com. Com.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Wabash Railroad v. PriddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Brantley Co. v. Ocean Steamship Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- United States v. Munson Steamship LineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.