Legal Opinion
Cin., NO & Tex. Pac. Railway v. Int. Com. Com.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 30, 1896No. 394, 473PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
162 U.S. 184 (1896)
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
v.
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.
Nos. 394, 473.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 30, 31, 1896.
Decided March 30, 1896.
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. N.J. Hammond and Mr. George F. Edmunds for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Edward Baxter for the railway companies. Mr. Edward Colston, Mr. George Hoadly, Jr., Mr. J.B. Cumming and Mr. George Hilyer were on his brief.
MR. JUSTICE…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by25 opinions
- Intermountain Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Associated PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.