Legal Opinion

Mentavlos v. Anderson

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 15, 2000No. CA 3:97-2718-17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion of defendants John Justice Anderson and James Saleeby for summary judgment and, with consent of all parties, for determination by the court of any factual issues relating to whether these defendants are state actors. The state actor inquiry is critical to any determination of liability under plaintiffs sole remaining claim, which is asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as to the moving defendants.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants Saleeby and Anderson violated plaintiffs…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mentavlos v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  2. Mentavlos v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API