Legal Opinion

United States v. Mull

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 22, 2017No. ACM S32367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

DREW, Chief Judge:

Appellant, a medical technician, was tried at a special court-martial composed of military judge alone. In accordance with his pleas, he was found guilty of fraudulent enlistment by falsely representing his preser-vice use of marijuana and heroin; dereliction of duty by willfully failing to properly dispose of used vials of various prescription drugs; divers wrongful use of heroin; divers wrongful use of ketamine hydrochloride, a Schedule III controlled substance; divers wrongful use of hydromorphone, a Schedule II controlled substance; divers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  3. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  4. United States v. GreenwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. MoonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GarrettUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  3. United States v. MedinaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API