Legal Opinion

Hammock v. Oakley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1934No. 6 Div. 568PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill to declare a mortgage void, and a cloud upon the title of complainants; to enjoin the foreclosure of said mortgage, and for general relief.

In order that the conclusion here reached may be fully understood, we will briefly state the facts in the case as disclosed by the bill, the answer thereto, and agreement of the parties on submission of the cause for final decree.

The appellant W. I. Hammock, in January, 1928, borrowed of appellee $300, and to secure the loan the appellants, husband and wife, executed to appellee a mortgage on certain property, including the homestead…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Abbett v. PageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Bank of Cottonwood v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Sumners v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M. C. Dixon Lumber Co. v. MathisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Joiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Leonard v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Cottingham v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Bowden v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API