Legal Opinion

Sumners v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1930No. 5 Div. 32PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in equity seeks to cancel a mortgage on complainant's homestead on the ground that his wife, who joined in it, was insane at the time, and because her separate acknowledgment was not taken in due form. A copy of the mortgage is attached to the bill, and recites an indebtedness as its consideration. It does not, neither does the bill, allege that the indebtedness arose at the time of the execution of the mortgage or thereafter by an advance of money or other thing of value. The bill did not offer to restore anything upon granting relief. Demurrer to the bill was sustained.

Counsel for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grider v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Hayes v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Hall v. BrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Coburn v. CokeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shaddix v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Groover v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Jones v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Gill Printing Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API