Legal Opinion

Brendle v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1937No. 33,579PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for the value of wheat alleged to have been wrongfully withheld from plaintiff by defendant. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The action arose out of the foreclosure of a mortgage on farm lands. Plaintiff was the mortgagor. Defendant was the mortgagee. It became necessary to foreclose the mortgage. Judgment of foreclosure was entered on September 18, 1933. The property was sold November 13, 1933. This sale was confirmed November 21, 1933. The period of redemption was fixed at eighteen months. The sheriff’s deed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. First National Bank of Clay Centre v. BeegleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. C. C. Isely Lumber Co. v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Myers v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Kasparek v. ThroopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Fox v. FlickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Masson, Inc. v. County Assessor of Wyandotte CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Hajny v. Robinson Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API