Legal Opinion

McHugh v. First Huntington National Bank

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1937No. 8535PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

The question here is the extent an invitee may rely upon the assurance of the invitor.

This is an action in damages for personal injuries. Upon conclusion of plaintiff’s opening statement to the jury, the trial court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that the statement showed plaintiff was not entitled to recover. While concurring in the procedure, he excepted to the ruling.

According to the statement, plaintiff and one other were working for a contractor, who had been employed by defendant to do some work in the lobby of its bank building. The work involved the use…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Snyder v. P., C. & St. L. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Fowler v. B. & O. R. R. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Pinello v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McHugh v. First Huntington National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API