Legal Opinion

Land Development, Inc. v. Padgett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1962No. 144PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

The only question here is whether the law will enforce, strictly in accordance with its terms, a typical forfeiture clause in a real estate sales contract.

In purchasing some real property the buyers 1 made a down payment and were given possession. They agreed to pay the seller 2 certain monthly installments of principal and interest until the balance of the purchase price was paid. In the meantime, the seller withheld the deed of conveyance. If the buyers defaulted as to any payments due, they were to lose everything: all payments made would be retained by seller “as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Foley v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Nelson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Henry Uihlein Realty Co. v. Downtown Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. DeGood v. GettleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Jameson v. WurtzAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pollastrine v. SeveranceAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Williams v. DeLayAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API