Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1985No. B010554Published

1Opinion of the Court

173 Cal.App.3d 223 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 533

FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ, COMSKY, KAHAN & DEUTSCH et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; CARL H. KREUGER, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. B010554.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 26, 1985.

COUNSEL

Murchison & Cumming, B. Eric Nelson, George M. Wallace, Saltzburg, Ray & Bergman, Horvitz & Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz, Frederic D. Cohen, S. Thomas Todd and Michael Nava for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Jack A. Fuller for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

LAVINE, J.[*]

Pursua…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Crest Catering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API