Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Hamburg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1931No. 40640PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant-city moved for a directed verdict, upon the ground that the plaintiff has failed to show that he was free from contributory negligence, and that it is shown by the evidence that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This motion was overruled. The motion was renewed at the close of all of the evidence and again overruled. The appellant complains that the court erred in said rulings, and this is the sole matter presented to this court by the appellant.

In order to constitute contributory negligence, the plaintiff, at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dreier v. McDermottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Gibson v. City of DenisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Lundy v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Cratty v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Hartman v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Sergeant v. ChallisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Buchanan v. Hurd Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Bell v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API