Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Hurd Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1932No. 41590PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

— The appellant’s sole complaints are (1) that the court erred in overruling its motion for a. directed verdict, which was made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all of the evidence, and (2) that the court erred in the giving of one of the instructions.

In the consideration of the first question, it will be necessary to refer somewhat in detail to the facts as disclosed by the evidence. At the time of the accident, on April 18, 1931, a truck owned by the defendant-corporation and operated by one of its employees was traveling south on South Avenue, where the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Brownfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. George v. Iowa & Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Sergeant v. ChallisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  4. Schwind v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Bauer v. ReavellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API