Legal Opinion
Columbus Industrial Bank v. Rosenblatt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff is a corporation of the type known as an “industrial bank,” incorporated under the provisions of Chapter 196 of the Public Acts of 1919. As such it had power, among other things, to loan money on real or personal security and “to sell its secured or unsecured certificates of indebtedness for investment, and to receive from purchasers thereof payment therefor in instalments or otherwise, the receipt of, or the agreement to receive, payment for any such certificate in equal weekly or monthly instalments extending over substantially the period of any loan secured by a pledge…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Manchester Realty Co. v. KanehlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Mutual Protective Corporation v. PalatnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Cohen v. MansiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
- Progressive Welfare Assn., Inc. v. MorduchaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.