L.A.W. v. M.E.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Appellant was brought before the trial court on a petition to establish paternity and provide support for the minor child of appellee pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-916(c)(1989). Appellant was represented by counsel and appellee was represented by the Office of Corporation Counsel pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-2341(a)(1989). On June 29, 1989 the parties appeared before Judge Michael Rankin, who made oral findings that appellant was the father of the child and that he owed a duty to support the child.
The matter was then referred to Hearing Commissioner Dennis Doyle to set the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- McDiarmid v. McDiarmidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Burtoff v. BurtoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Arlt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Camalier & Buckley, Inc. v. Sandoz & Lamberton, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995