Camalier & Buckley, Inc. v. Sandoz & Lamberton, Inc.

In my view, we have no jurisdiction to hear this claim because the trial judge’s order, given as it was without explanation, was not dispositive of any issue, therefore, was not final, and hence, not appealable. D.C.Code § ll-721(a)(l) (1995). Nonetheless, for the reasons set forth below, I concur in the results reached by Judge Farrell.

I

I do not quarrel with the facts as set forth in Part I of Judge Farrell’s opinion and I will not repeat them here. Also, I agree with the observation expressed in that opinion that, to be final under § ll-721(a)(l), an order must “dispose! ] of the whole case…