International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 344 v. National Labor Relations Board, and Purolator Security, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this appeal is the statutory and constitutional validity of the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) determination that it is an unfair labor practice for a union composed of guard and non-guard employees to picket in order to force an employer to recognize that union as the bargaining agent for a unit of driver-guard employees.
I
This case arises on a petition of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 344 (the Union) to set aside a decision of the NLRB, 228 NLRB No. 172 (Apr. 12, 1977), ordering the Union to cease and desist from picketing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rosenthal & Company, Etc. v. William T. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- International Transportation Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Miller v. United Food And Commercial Workers Union, Local 498, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Local 851, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.