Local 851, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
At issue is the board’s determination that Purolator Courier’s driver-employees are “guards” within the meaning of § 9(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 159(b)(3). If they are, then Local 851 cannot admit them to membership along with its nonguard members without being barred from certification as a bargaining representative of the guards. The union contends that the board’s interpretation of § 9(b)(3) contravenes both the legislative history and purpose of that statute, because the Purolator employees do not “guard” any property, but are merely truck drivers…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 344 v. National Labor Relations Board, and Purolator Security, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local No. 71, A/W International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Local 851, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984