Legal Opinion

Local 851, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 13, 1984No. Nos. 1072, 1026, Dockets 83-4219, 84-4019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At issue is the board’s determination that Purolator Courier’s driver-employees are “guards” within the meaning of § 9(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 159(b)(3). If they are, then Local 851 cannot admit them to membership along with its nonguard members without being barred from certification as a bargaining representative of the guards. The union contends that the board’s interpretation of § 9(b)(3) contravenes both the legislative history and purpose of that statute, because the Purolator employees do not “guard” any property, but are merely truck drivers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 344 v. National Labor Relations Board, and Purolator Security, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local No. 71, A/W International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Local 851, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API