Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Philip Morris Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1993No. 93-6018PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 F.3d 417
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Michael O. TATUM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, doing business as Philip Morris
USA, a foreign corporation; Philip Morris Management
Corporation, a foreign…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jacqui Starr v. Pearle Vision, Inc., Doing Business as Pearle Vision ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Tesh v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Roberts v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012