Legal Opinion
Baber v. Buckley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 10, 1974No. 7913PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This appeal, taken by the plaintiff in an automobile collision case, seeks to reinstate a $5,000 verdict which was set aside by an order granting a new trial. The second trial concluded in a verdict for the defense and the appeal is from the now final order granting the new trial. See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110, 409 F.2d 145 (1969). The issue presented calls into question the propriety of granting a new trial on a ground not raised in the new trial motion, and on the basis of a visual aid (a blackboard) not now capable of being included in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Mary Demeretz v. Daniels Motor Freight, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.