Legal Opinion
In Re Palmer
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 22, 2000No. 00-234PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
Bail bondsman Shelley Palmer appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration revoking his insurance agent’s license and fining him $10,000 for engaging in a pattern of financially irresponsible, dishonest, and untrustworthy conduct. We affirm.
Palmer does not dispute the findings made by the Department’s hearing officer and adopted by the Commissioner, which reveal the following. Palmer is a bail bondsman who was first issued an insurance agent’s license by the Department in August 1992. After obtaining his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Leasing Service Corp. v. BroetjeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Lanphere v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Brody v. BaraschSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maglin v. TschannerlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re Picket Fence PreviewSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- In re Appeal of MadoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Joan Falcao v. Mitchel RichardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.