United States v. Private E1 WILLIAM M. HUDGINS
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification each of conspiracy to commit maiming and maiming, in violation of Articles 81 and 124, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881 and 924 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for ten months. The military judge credited appellant with four days of confinement credit.
This case is before the court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866. We have considered…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. FinsterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. KemaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010