Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 WILLIAM M. HUDGINS

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 25, 2010No. ARMY 20090737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification each of conspiracy to commit maiming and maiming, in violation of Articles 81 and 124, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881 and 924 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for ten months. The military judge credited appellant with four days of confinement credit.

This case is before the court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866. We have considered…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. FinsterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. KemaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API