Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Dillingham v. McCarty
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 27, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 6172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARRAJ, District Judge.
This matter came on before the Court on motions to quash service of summons as to defendants McFall and Best. The action was brought under provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a through 270d. Service on McFall and Best could not be obtained in the District of Colorado, and pursuant to authority granted by an Order of this Court, the summons and complaint were served upon them in Wichita Falls, Texas. The motions to quash were grounded on the contention that “ * * * no statute of the United States provides for service in this (Miller Act) case beyond the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Canton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Congress Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Texas Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. SkovDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company, Inc. v. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., Allsop Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- O'KEEFE v. New York City Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
- United States ex rel. Claussen-Olson-Benner, Inc. v. Doolittle Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1961
- United States ex rel. Grand Rapids Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. HumphreyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1961