Legal Opinion
United States v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 10, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 43683PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
The Miller Act proceeding has been instituted under the provisions of Title 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq. by the United States for the use of plaintiff, Vermont Marble Company, a corporation, against defendants Roscoe-Ajax Construction Company, et al. The plaintiff as subcontractor is claiming sums allegedly due and owing under a written subcontract agreement entered into with the general contractor Roscoe-Ajax in connection with a construction project in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. (Contract No. GS-09B-C-1021 SF, November 10,1960). The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Pittsburgh Tank & Tower, Inc. v. G & C Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- McClure Estimating Co. v. H. G. Reynolds Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Abadou v. TradAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MehanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States Ex Rel. Coffey v. William R. Austin Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.