Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Boak Fish Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1902No. Nos. 13,012-(133)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for. Ramsey county to recover $5,000 for damages suffered through maintenance by defendant of a nuisance. From a judgment in favor of defendant upon the pleadings, entered pursuant to an order of Otis, J., plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Appellant, proprietor of the Merchants’ Hotel, in the city of St. Paul, commenced an action in the district court of Ramsey county in 1900 against the respondent corporation for the purpose of restraining and enjoining it from maintaining the premises adjoining the hotel as a nuisance, which consisted in keeping and storing fish there. The complaint alleged that respondent maintained the nuisance from May 1,1897, to the commencement of the trial, and damages were demanded in the sum of $5,000. The allegation of the complaint was put in issue by the answer, and the cause was tried, resulting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. Comminge & Geisler v. StevensonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Henderson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Perdue v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API