In Re Estate of Andernovics
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride
The primary question presented in this appeal.is whether section 18 — 7(a) of the Probate Act of 1975 (Act) (755 ILCS 5/18 — 7(a) (West 1998)) or section 2 — 610 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 610 (West 1998)) applies when an estate files a nonspecific response to a probate complainant’s claim, demanding strict proof of that claim. In February 1989, plaintiff, Peggy L. Parrish, filed a 10-count complaint against the estate of Budris Andernovics, alleging that Andernovics breached an oral contract to make a will. Subsequently, plaintiff argued that she was entitled to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Boatmen's National Bank v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ciomber v. Cooperative Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Carroll v. PaddockIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People Ex Rel. Graf v. Village of Lake BluffIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- In re: Estate of WeilandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.