Legal Opinion

Branson v. Department of Revenue

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. 78408PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a notice of tax penalty liability and the certified record of the Department of Revenue (Department) are sufficient to establish a prima facie case of willful failure to pay retailers’ occupation taxes pursuant to section lSUs of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 120, par. 4521/2 (repealed effective January 1, 1994; replacement provision enacted as section 3—7 of the Uniform Penalty and Interest Act, 35 ILCS 735/3—7)).

Following an administrative hearing, the Department confirmed a tax penalty against plaintiff,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hernon v. E.W. Corrigan Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Decatur v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 268Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Milton R. Psaty, and Martin M. Psaty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Orris C. Ruth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API