Branson v. Department of Revenue
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a notice of tax penalty liability and the certified record of the Department of Revenue (Department) are sufficient to establish a prima facie case of willful failure to pay retailers’ occupation taxes pursuant to section lSUs of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 120, par. 4521/2 (repealed effective January 1, 1994; replacement provision enacted as section 3—7 of the Uniform Penalty and Interest Act, 35 ILCS 735/3—7)).
Following an administrative hearing, the Department confirmed a tax penalty against plaintiff,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hernon v. E.W. Corrigan Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Decatur v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 268Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Milton R. Psaty, and Martin M. Psaty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Orris C. Ruth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.