Legal Opinion

Hollowell v. Satterfield

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 7, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

In the year 1901 the appellant, John W. Hollowell, the appellee, F. T. Satterfield, and O. 0. Larkin obtained, for an agreed consideration, of one E. M. Tyree a written lease, for a term of ninety-nine years, to the mineral rights in a farm in Caldwell county containing valuable deposits of the mineral known as “fluorspar.” In 1911 Larkin left the state and abandoned his interest in the *118lease. Thereupon Tyree executed a new lease to the mineral rights in the farm to Hollowell and Satterfield as equal partners, which continued in effect until the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollowell v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Bower & Bower v. CollinsworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Langhan v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Towles v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API