Legal Opinion
Hollowell v. Satterfield
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 17, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Affirming.
For many years R. N. Tyrie has been the owner of a farm near Princeton, containing a deposit of fluorspar. In the year 1901, he leased the mineral rights to C. C. Larkin, F. T. Satterfield and John W. Hollowell for a period of ninety-nine years. In addition to certain royalties, the lease provided for the payment of an annual rental of $50.00 on or before the tenth day of January in each year, and for a forfeiture of the lease in case of nonpayment on or before that time.
The lease was continued in effect until the year 1911,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Mitchell v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Knapp v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Rankin v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Axton v. Kentucky Bottlers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Van Hooser v. KeenonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Hollowell v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Smith v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Miles v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.