Legal Opinion

Conklin v. United States Shipbuilding Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 22, 1903No. 569PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. This was an application on the part of the complainants to ratify, approve, and confirm within the District of Maine the appointment by the Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey of James Smith, Jr., of New Jersey, as receiver of all the assets of the United States Shipbuilding Company.

Read the full summary

In Equity. This was an application on the part of the complainants to ratify, approve, and confirm within the District of Maine the appointment by the Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey of James Smith, Jr., of New Jersey, as receiver of all the assets of the United States Shipbuilding Company. The application was made in this court to Judge Putnam on the 13th day of July, 3903; but Judge Putnam stating that it was his settled practice to make no" appointments of receivers, either original or ancillary, without public notice, an order to show cause was made, returnable this day, of…

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, Circuit Judge

(orally). I think the interests of all the parties demand that I should give my views on this case now. The position is an extremely difficult one, arising from the fact that the two subsidiary corporations in Maine sold out their plants to the Shipbuilding Company, and yet continued to make contracts in their own names. It is also complicated by the more serious fact that, although the decree of the Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, the place of domicile, in a certain way authorizes the receiver to continue the business of the United States Shipbuilding Company, yet it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Primos Chemical Co. v. Fulton Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1918
  2. Brill v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Roberts Cotton Oil Co. v. F. E. Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Bluefields S. S. Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  5. Haydock v. Fisheries Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API