Brill v. Southerland
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Chief Justice,
delivering the opinion of the court:
The appellants offer numerous reasons why the decree of the court below should be reversed, none of them having substantial merit.
It is urged that no determination can be made by this court without notice to August Stickel, co-complainant; that the order of the Federal Court in New Jersey fixing allowances to the ancillary receiver and counsel was futile as an ex parte order; that the bond given by the appellants was a cost bond only and did not embrace allowances and fees to the receivers and counsel; that the suit, being a class…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farmers' Loan Co. v. Or. Pac. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Farmers National Bank v. BackusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Conklin v. United States Shipbuilding Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1903
- Sonneborn v. . LibbeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- First National Bank of Fairbanks v. DualAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. BirkinsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Liebman v. Institutional Investors TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Badr Abdelhameed Dhia Jafar v. Vatican Challenge 2017, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- In Re Dissolution of Jeffco Management, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.