Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson County, Tenn.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 9, 1983No. Civ. 3-82-83PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.

The United States brought this action seeking a declaration that a state property tax imposed upon a government contractor is invalid. The case is now before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment.

The United States owns in fee simple approximately 811 acres and 300 buildings and structures in Anderson County, Tennessee. This property is known as the Y-12 Plant which is a part of an integrated system of federally owned laboratories and plants operated by the United States Department of Energy [DOE] to develop and produce nuclear weapons for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Anderson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. AlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Anderson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Town of Dandridge v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Dennis Turner v. City of Bean StationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API