Legal Opinion · Dissent

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 8, 1988No. 87-3797Published

1DissentHutchinson, Circuit Judge

The difficulties of statutory exegesis with which the opinion for the court strug*448gles are common and all too real in statutes affecting politically and economically potent interest groups. The understandable institutional constraints imposed on the political branches of our tripartite government often leave an ambiguous no-man’s land of conflict between different statutes affecting the same parties. As the opinion for the court recognizes, it is nevertheless our task to reconcile the differences between the statutes, if possible, and when their terms are irreconcilable, to determine as best…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co., Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API