Legal Opinion

Miami National Bank v. Willens

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1963No. Appeal, 324PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Defendant-appellees, Paul M. Willens and Arthur F. Willens, both residents of Florida, were president and secretary respectively of Peninsular Fiber Glass Products, Inc. On or before August 21, 1959, appellees acting both in their capacity as officers of the corporation and as individuals, made and delivered a $7,000 note to the plaintiff-appellant, Miami National Bank. At the time of this transaction each appellee owned a one-quarter fee simple interest in a property located in Philadelphia. On December 17, 1959, appellees transferred without consideration their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Iscovitz v. FildermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Queen-Favorite B. & L. Ass'n v. BursteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. DeMatteo v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. First National Bank v. HoffinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Pfister v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Baker v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API