Farr v. Wright

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

This an appeal from a judgment in a medical malpractice case. The jury found appellee, Dr. John Wright, was not negligent. Appellants, Cheryl and Peter Farr, complain of rulings excluding evidence of several alleged similar prior acts or transactions involving appellee which occurred within two months of the alleged negligent act in this case. We reverse.

The evidence showed that Cheryl Farr was injured while working at a Red Lobster restaurant in Victoria. Dr. John Wright treated her. One of the procedures he performed was three-level discogram. A discogram…