Legal Opinion
State of NM Ex Rel. Udall v. Watkins
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2527, 91-2929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.
These consolidated cases are before the Court on summary judgment motions. In New Mexico v. Watkins, Civil Action No. 91-2527, defendants Department of Energy, et al. (“DOE”), and plaintiff-inter-venors, Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. (“NRDC”) have filed cross motions for summary judgment. In Environmental Defense Fund v. Watkins, Civil Action No. 91-2929, plaintiffs Environmental Defense Fund, et al. (“EDF”) move for summary judgment.
I
Briefly, the facts are as follows. This controversy involves a DOE project entitled the Waste Isolation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of New Mexico v. James D. Watkins, Secretary, Department of Energy, State of New Mexico, Ex Rel. Tom Udall, Attorney General v. James D. Watkins, Secretary, Department of Energy, Environmental Defense Fund v. James D. Watkins, Secretary, Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- New Mexico Ex Rel. Madrid v. RichardsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992