People v. Wright
Illinois Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CHIEF JUSTICE FREEMAN,
specially concurring:
I strongly disagree with the conclusions reached in today’s opinion, particularly that which holds that section 122 — 1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is a statute of limitation that can be waived by the State on appeal if not first raised in the circuit court. Because I cannot concur in my colleagues’ decision on this point, I join only in the judgment of the court.
r
Section 122 — 1 of the Act states that no proceedings can be commenced under the Act after the passage of certain enumerated periods of time, unless the petition “alleges facts…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.