Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Wright

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1999No. 84721Published

1Concurrence

CHIEF JUSTICE FREEMAN,

specially concurring:

I strongly disagree with the conclusions reached in today’s opinion, particularly that which holds that section 122 — 1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is a statute of limitation that can be waived by the State on appeal if not first raised in the circuit court. Because I cannot concur in my colleagues’ decision on this point, I join only in the judgment of the court.

r

Section 122 — 1 of the Act states that no proceedings can be commenced under the Act after the passage of certain enumerated periods of time, unless the petition “alleges facts…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API