Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The accused contends that the evidence produced upon the trial did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He has followed the procedure outlined in State v. Frost, 105 Conn. 326, 135 Atl. 446, and assigned this reason of appeal and that the subordinate facts do not support the conclusion of the court, also claiming that the finding should be corrected by striking out certain paragraphs and adding paragraphs of the draft-finding. The claim is made that certain facts were found without evidence and that certain admitted or undisputed facts were not found.
The State claimed that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Phillips v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- State v. PearceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. BartlettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
- State v. CleavesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. MayellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.