Legal Opinion
Singh v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2003No. 01-1102PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
Sabriyana Singh commenced this action in State court against Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., a health maintenance organization, seeking primarily reimbursement of monies paid to Prudential pursuant to a subrogation term in its policy that was issued as an employee benefit plan. Singh’s complaint alleged that the subro-gation term was illegal under the provisions of the Maryland Health Maintenance Organization…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Jean Levine, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United Healthcare Corporation (Dc Nj 01-Cv-04964)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Helfrich v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield AssocCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Justin Hart v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health and Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.