Legal Opinion

People v. Guenther

Rochester City Court

Decided February 10, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlphonse L. Cassetti, J.

Telephonic interceptions of conversations with defendant, Kenneth Guenther, were made over a 10-day period, pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant. Upon cessation of the eavesdropping, the tapes were placed in a gym-type locker shared by the police officers who had made the intercepts. The locker was secured by a key-type padlock, and the only keys to that padlock were in the possession of the two officers who shared the locker. The only time the tapes were removed from the locker was when duplicate recordings were made and when the tapes were taken to the Judge who issued the warrant for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. NicolettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. WinogradNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. RiccoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. People v. GlasserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API